EC
ENVIRI Corp (NVRI)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 2025 revenue was $575M (flat YoY) and Adjusted EBITDA was $74M; adjusted diluted EPS was $(0.08). Against S&P Global consensus, revenue was a slight beat ($575M vs $573.2M*), but EPS missed ($(0.08) vs $(0.03)) and Adjusted EBITDA missed ($74M vs ~$82.2M) .
- Full-year 2025 guidance was cut: Adjusted EBITDA to $268–$278M (from $290–$310M) and Adjusted Free Cash Flow to $(30)–$(20)M (from $15–$35M). Q4 Adjusted EBITDA is guided to $62–$72M .
- Clean Earth delivered another record quarter: revenue $250M (+6% YoY), Adjusted EBITDA $43M, margin 17.3%. Harsco Environmental improved sequentially (margin 17.0%), while Harsco Rail remained a drag with a $(4)M Adjusted EBITDA loss amid weak demand .
- Strategic alternatives advanced: management discussed structures to unlock Clean Earth value and noted an amended credit agreement enabling a Clean Earth sale; they are “optimistic” the process concludes by year-end .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Clean Earth another record quarter with strong cash generation, driven by higher volumes and services pricing; revenue $250M (+6% YoY), Adjusted EBITDA $43M, margin 17.3% .
“Clean Earth delivered another record quarter with strong cash flow generation, driven by higher volumes and services pricing.” — CEO Nick Grasberger . - Harsco Environmental margin reached 17.0% in Q3; management said the business “troughed” in H1 and expects 2026 to be better, with cost-out actions and price increases to offset cost inflation .
- Adjusted free cash flow improved to $6M in Q3 (from $(14)M in Q2), supported by working capital and capex controls; net cash from operating activities was $34M .
What Went Wrong
- Harsco Rail remained the largest headwind: Adjusted EBITDA loss $(4)M with weak demand for standard equipment and aftermarket parts; Q4 rail results projected lower mainly due to volumes .
- Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA declined YoY to $74M (vs $85M in Q3 2024), with lower contributions from Harsco Environmental and Rail; divestitures in HE also reduced EBITDA by ~$3M YoY .
- Guidance cut: FY Adjusted EBITDA midpoint reduced by $27M and Adjusted FCF midpoint reduced by $50M, driven predominantly by rail, with some HE pressure from higher operating costs/new site contributions .
Financial Results
Segment breakdown (Q3 2025 vs Q3 2024):
KPIs (quarterly):
Estimates vs Actuals (Q3 2025):
Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Guidance Changes
Credit agreement amendment: net leverage covenant revised (5.25x YE’25; 5.00x YE’26; step down to 4.00x in Q2’27), enabling potential sale of Clean Earth and setting surviving capital structure framework .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Clean Earth delivered another record quarter with strong cash flow generation, driven by higher volumes and services pricing… On a consolidated basis, our results were impacted primarily by Harsco Rail, due to weak demand… Given the mixed performance in the quarter, we’ve lowered our full year outlook.” — CEO Nick Grasberger .
- Strategic alternatives: “We have seen strong and definitive interest in our Clean Earth business… one [structure] involves a simultaneous sale of Clean Earth together with a taxable spin… We believe we should be in a position to conclude our process review prior to the end of this year.” — CEO Nick Grasberger .
- CFO on Q3 drivers and outlook: “Unusual items totaled $12M pre-tax… adjusted free cash flow for the quarter was $6M… The midpoint of EBITDA guidance is reduced by $27M, and… free cash flow… by $50M… Q4 adjusted EBITDA is expected to range from $62–$72M” .
Q&A Highlights
- Sale process timeline and valuation: Management reiterated strong interest in Clean Earth and aim to conclude by year-end; multiples expected to be consistent with precedent transactions .
- Guidance cut composition: Predominantly rail; removal of volumes not supported by firm orders or pipeline visibility; HE lowered modestly as Q3 pace persists into Q4 .
- Clean Earth SDM vs hazardous waste: FY hazardous waste EBITDA expected up ~15% and SDM down ~15% due to project timing/mix; SDM backlog remains attractive .
- Rail baseline EBITDA: Longer-term standalone base business modeled at ~$35–$40M; current depressed demand implies ~$30M run rate .
Estimates Context
- Q3 2025 actuals versus S&P Global consensus: revenue modest beat ($574.8M vs $573.2M*), EPS miss ($(0.08) vs $(0.03)), Adjusted EBITDA miss ($74.4M vs ~$82.2M). Combined with lowered FY and Q4 guidance, Street models for rail and HE are likely to be revised down, with CE estimates supported by record performance . Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Clean Earth is the bright spot with sustained margin expansion (17.3%) and record earnings, supporting the thesis of portfolio value unlock via potential sale .
- Rail remains the principal earnings drag; demand weakness and negative mix drove an Adjusted EBITDA loss and the majority of the FY guidance cut .
- Harsco Environmental improved sequentially and could benefit from EU steel safeguards in 2026; near-term cost inflation/new site contributions weigh on results .
- FY 2025 guidance reset (Adj EBITDA $268–$278M; FCF $(30)–$(20)M) and Q4 EBITDA $62–$72M frame a more conservative near-term setup .
- Strategic alternatives catalyze the story: amended credit agreement enables Clean Earth sale; post-transaction net leverage targeted ~2x initially (max 3x), improving equity narrative for HE/Rail .
- Non-GAAP adjustments were material in Q3 (e.g., strategic costs $5.3M; employee termination $6.0M; contract loss provision $1.6M), impacting GAAP EPS; focus remains on de-risking ETO projects .
- Q3 underperformed prior Q3 outlook (company guided $76–$86M vs actual $74M), underscoring conservative positioning for Q4 and FY .